Deficiencies and false promises in the Mexican Public Health system have led many to turn to the private sector for health care.

Since the introduction of new, harsher anti-immigration politics by the Trump administration, the debate over the treatment of people attempting to cross the border illegally has been hotly revived.

The world seems to be facing an identity crisis.

The decriminalization of abortion in Argentina seems to have entered a stalemate, and this is due to the religious, and consequently, roundabout nature of this conversation.

What began as reaction to pension reform in April has become a political situation of maximum instability.

In the upcoming assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS), the crisis situations in Nicaragua and Venezuela will likely be central discussions and the OAS will have to decide which is more critical.

The civil unrest in Argentina continues as president Mauricio Macri reaches out desperately for solutions and stability. For the former, he signed with the controversial International Monetary Fund (IMF), and for the latter, he has placed his confidence in the Armed Forces to confront the dissident citizenry.

The nations of Latin America have in common a delayed scientific and technological development. These similarities suggest that the model of economic development has been imposed by an outside force—the United States.

In the midst of the national standstill that overtook the country, a scene occurred that reflected the Brazilian people’s widespread disorientation, and suspended prior rational notions.

Latin American governments used to represent a wide variety of viable political models: on the right, countries like Peru, Colombia, and Mexico were “models of neoliberal continuity” strong enough to resist populist threats; the more centrist countries of Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay were able to balance market and redistributive policies; and on the left, the